Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Two quick links: peer review of bioinfo software and low engagement on post-publication review

The first post also links to an interesting and simple suggestion to help improve the review process when software is involved: a checklist where reviewers tell if the code is available, if the program runs on available data and is well documented.

Bonus link: why closed source has no place in science.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Before writing, please read carefully my policy for comments. Some comments may be deleted.

Please do not include links to commercial or unrelated sites in your comment or signature, or I'll flag it as SPAM.


Related Posts with Thumbnails